It is difficult to say definitively whether there is an objective reality in which things exist independently of our minds. Solipsistically speaking, it is difficult to even determine whether anything exists at all independently of our mind. Although a good argument for the questionable nature of this doubt is language – because who needs a language if it is only supposed to talk to itself? If we assume that there’s only me and I use these words, why are they understandable to others who are part of my projection? In general, technically speaking, when we talk about something, we assume that it exists. It’s impossible to talk about something that can’t be communicated. This vision is reassuring because it assumes the existence of a reality with objectively verifiable characteristics that exist independently of our thoughts or language. The echo, however, returns from a different angle, in the form of the inability to describe the real. What we call reality does not exist independently as something that simply is. It cannot be captured, described, or assigned properties. At the same time, it is something constituted by language and systems. I am able to speak and describe what seems to me to be reality, but never get to the heart of the matter.